MINUTES OF THE 97^TH CONVENTION

FIRST BUSINESS MEETING
Thursday, October 5, Cartier Ballroom, Marriott Renaissance Hotel, Detroit, MI

President Douglas M. Green called the Convention to order at 3:05 p.m. In accord with the Bylaws, Secretary J.D. Froula served as Secretary of the Convention.

The Secretary reported that a quorum was present although final registration was incomplete; voting delegates and national officers were registered. Executive Councillor Catherine P. Rice introduced members of the Executive Council, Executive Council-elect, Fellowship Board member Susan L. Holl, Director of Rituals Alan R. Hirsch, Director of Engineering Futures Russell W. Pierce, Executive Director Froula, Assistant Secretary-Treasurer R.E. Hawks, Convention Chair Ronald M. Hickling, District Directors and Engineering Futures Facilitators present.

The Report of the Director of Fellowships was given by Dr. Holl, who reviewed the history of the Fellowship and Scholarship Program. She said that 35 Fellows were named from 208 applicants last year on a competitive basis, and she reviewed the criteria. Last year, 38 Scholars were selected from 314 applicants on a competitive basis. She reviewed the scholarship criteria and encouraged the delegates to apply for either program.

The Report of the Director of Engineering Futures was given by Mr. Pierce, who encouraged the delegates to take advantage of the Engineering Futures Program and the skills taught and to schedule seminars on their campuses; last year 249 sessions reached 3,500 students; the program helps to make Tau Beta Pi the premier honor society in the world. In the last four years, 800 sessions were presented to 13,000 students. He introduced Director of Engineering Futures-elect, Annette M. Brenner, and presented certificates to facilitators Iron Man S.V. Eckersall (20) and Iron Woman S.C. Dao (27), for presenting the most sessions.

The President’s Report for the Executive Council for 2001-02 was presented by Dr. Green. It is a part of these minutes and will be published in the Winter 2003 BENT.

The President and Secretary-Treasurer of the Association constitute the Committee on Order of Convention Business, according to the Bylaws. An agenda for the order of business had been prepared and was sent to all delegates in advance. It was adopted on a voice vote on motion by Secretary Froula, seconded by A. Shertok, (MI G), as follows:

First Business Meeting:
Official opening of the Convention
Quorum report of the Secretary-Treasurer
Introduction of National Officials
Report of Director of Fellowships
Report of Director of Engineering Futures
President’s report for Executive Council
Adoption of Convention Agenda
Assumption of the chair by the permanent Convention Chair

Second Business Meeting:
Reports of Committees: Petitions, Chapter and Association Financial Affairs, Rituals, Convention Site, Resolutions, Award, Candidate and Electee Duties (ad hoc), Curriculum Eligibililty (ad hoc), and Constitution and Bylaws.

Third Business Meeting:
Action as necessary on Committee recommendations
New business

Final Business Meeting:
Presentation of Greater Interest in Government Chapter Project Grants
Presentation of National Outstanding Advisor Award
Presentation of Laureate Awards
Presentation of Distinguished Alumnus Award
Final Report of Awards Committee
Final Report of Resolutions Committee
Installation of Executive Council
Official adjournment

Appointment of delegates to the Convention Committees had been made by the Secretary in advance as required by the Bylaws, and the committees were given instructions and information about their assignments. “Standing” committees are specified in the Constitution. Committees select their own chairs, and national officer advisors and consultants are named for each committee. Committees for this Convention were:

President Green announced that the Executive Council had appointed Ronald M. Hickling as Permanent Chair of the Convention, in accord with the Bylaws. He yielded the gavel to Mr. Hickling who announced that Trust Advisory Committee member James W. Johnson would serve as Convention Parliamentarian, Robert’s Rules of Order would be followed at the business meetings, and closure would be reached on all business issues. With the aid of a PowerPoint presentation, Mr. Johnson presented the fundamental principles of parliamentary procedure.

Chairman Hickling declared the First Business Meeting of the Convention closed at 4:06 p.m.

********************

The Headquarters display was present during the Convention in the Renaissance foyer of the hotel, where refreshments were served from noon until 3:00 p.m. Recruiting displays were staffed by Fluor, General Motors, Lockheed Martin, University of Detroit Mercy, and Vector SCM.

A Pre-Convention Issues Forum was held in the Duluth room at 12:30 p.m., hosted by Councillor Atkins.

Meetings of all Convention Committees were held in rooms and various areas of the hotel starting at 4:10 p.m. Engineering Futures Facilitators presented Engineering Futures orientation meetings for all non-voting delegates.
District Meetings and an orientation meeting for committee chairs were held in rooms and various areas of the hotel starting at 5:20 p.m.

The Welcoming Dinner of the Convention was held at 6:30 p.m. in the Columbus Ballroom of the hotel; seating was by Districts. Arrangements Chair Abha Tiwari was mistress of ceremonies. Robert M. Ottolini, MI Z '78, engineering manager with General Motors, welcomed the group to the building purchased by his firm in 1996 and in which $500 million has been invested; he noted that the learning never stops when you enjoy your job. Michigan Epsilon President Boban Jancevski welcomed the delegates, encouraged them to meet each other, and offered the assistance of his chapter for all situations. Dr. Ralph H. Kummler, NY G '62, interim dean of engineering at Wayne State University, welcomed the delegates to Detroit in fulfillment of the vision of Michigan Epsilon to host the meeting. The chapter has won the top engineering organization award in his college for six of the last seven years. He thanked the delegates for giving their valuable time to support this outstanding society. Dr. George Dambach, vice president-research of WSU, reviewed the history of his institution of 31,000 students including 18,000 undergraduates. With the sixth largest graduate school in the nation, it is working to become a major urban research university and has $200 million in research income. President Green welcomed the delegates on behalf of the Association, thanked the hosts for all of their hard work so far, and encouraged the delegates to speak up during the Convention. A total of 429 people enjoyed the banquet, sponsored by GM, featuring chicken.

Meetings of all Convention Committees and Engineering Futures groups reconvened at 8:00 p.m.

A meeting of Advisors and Alumnus Delegates was conducted at 9:30 p.m. by Drs. D.M. Green and D.J. Tyner.

Refreshments were served at 9:30 p.m., compliments of General Motors. A T-shirt swap was conducted during the evening, managed by Michigan Epsilon.

********************

SECOND BUSINESS MEETING
Friday, October 4, Cartier Ballroom, Marriott Renaissance Center

Chairman Hickling called the meeting to order at 8:12 a.m. The Tellers’ Committee, comprised of alternate delegates, had been appointed by Chairman Hickling as follows: J.D. Backus (MI G Alt.), S.T. Bauer (IA A Laur.), B.A. Belsky (MI G Alt.), G.M. Davidson (MI G Alt.), J.S. Duraiswamy (MI G Alt.), S. Jain (MI G Alt.), E.S. Stone (MI G Alt.), A.Vachhani (MI G Alt.), S.R. Venkat (MI G Alt.), E.R. Wolters (MI G Alt.), and M.S. Wu (MI G Alt.).

The Report of the Committee on Petitions was called. E.A. Woodward (VA B), Chair, reported that her committee had reviewed the final petition and the report of the inspection committee for Tau Beta Phi at Virginia Commonwealth University and had met with the petitioners and heard their presentation. She introduced Jacob H. Leach, president of the society, who reviewed its history since its establishment in 1999. Virginia's largest urban university, VCU includes an engineering school with three ABET-accredited engineering programs and a fourth under review. This society was founded with the goal of petitioning for a chapter of Tau Beta Pi. It includes 20 active members and 50 alumni. Programs include judging a robotics competition, tutoring, and mentorship. Membership is restricted to the top one-eighth of the junior engineering class and top one-fifth of the senior engineering class and includes a 3.5 minimal GPA cutoff. He reviewed the membership selection process and extensive support from the faculty and administration. Ms. Woodward moved, seconded by J.A. Curry, (TX I), to approve the petition from Virginia Commonwealth University and to establish the Virginia Epsilon Chapter. T.K. Stone (CO B) inquired if the inspection committee had made recommendations and whether they were met. Ms. Woodward replied that all suggestions were resolved satisfactorily. There was no further discussion, and ballots were distributed. When the voting was completed, Mr. Hickling later announced the results: 193 in favor and none opposed. The chapter was therefore granted, to be known as Virginia Epsilon. Representatives were brought to the front of the room and given an enthusiastic standing ovation.

The Report of the Committee on Chapter and Association Financial Affairs was called. J.R. Pascual (FL B), Vice Chair, said that his group had completed two of its four charges and would report during the Third Business Meeting.

The Report of the Committee on Rituals was called. C.P. Petrie (IA B), Chair, said that his group was preparing for the model initiation and had recommended changes to the Tau Beta Pi presentation for guests who could not witness an initiation ceremony.

The Report of the Committee on Convention Site was called. Z.M. Thomas (NY B), Chair, said that his group had heard presentations from Colorado Beta and from Utah Alpha/Beta/Gamma to host the 2005 Convention and will conclude its report in the Third Business Meeting.

The Report of the Committee on Resolutions was called. J.C. Cheung, (CA A), Chair, said that her group was working on its assignments, including a review of the Distinguished Alumnus Program, and would report in the Third Business Meeting.

The Report of the Committee on Candidate and Electee Duties (ad hoc) was called. A.T. Barnes (NV B), Chair, moved, seconded by A.J. Flowerday (MI I), to amend Bylaw VII, Section 7.02 as shown below.

Bylaw VII
Initiation
SECTION 7.02. Electee Duties. While duties for the electees are permissible, they shall be limited to tasks and duties that are a test of an electee's intellectuality and mentality rather than physical strength and endurance and shall not consume an inordinate amount of time to the possible detriment of required college work. If an electee objects to the required duties and the chapter cannot resolve the objection, the electee may appeal to the Advisory Board of the Chapter. If the electee is still not satisfied, the electee will be given contact information for the District Director, who will advise the parties on resolution. Physical violence, offense to dignity or decency, or public exercises that make the electee ridiculous in any way shall not be permitted. The expense of any electee activity shall be carefully considered and not be prohibitory to the Chapter or the electee.
(Underlined words added.)

Director of Rituals Hirsch inquired about the background for the proposal. Ms. Barnes said that this would provide for an appeal process where none previously exists. B.L. Frost III (D7D) said that this should not be a District Director's responsibility and moved, seconded by C.G. Campbell (TX B), to remove the above sentence "If the electee is still not satisfied ...parties on resolution." T.K. Stone (CO B) said that the proposal still allowed the decision to remain within the chapter and its advisory board. The amendment failed on a voice vote. Ms. Barnes said that the chapter would be responsible to inform the electees of the appeals process. Chairman Hickling ruled, without objection, to table the motion until the Third Business Meeting.

The Report of the Committee on Curriculum Eligibility (ad hoc) was called. A.J. Flowerday (MI I), Chair, said that his group was charged to consider the eligibility for membership in Tau Beta Pi of students in all programs that obviously are not engineering programs, especially focusing on the immediate need to resolve the issue of eligibility of computer science majors. His group had obtained information from the Executive Council and would study the issue before proposing a course of action in the Third Business Meeting.

The Report of the Committee on Constitution and Bylaws was called. R.R. Lapierre (MA Z), Chair, said that his group had reviewed two proposals. The first would require chapters to list in their own bylaws any curricula that qualify a candidate for eligibility, and it would be presented in the Third Business Meeting. The second proposal is a package proposal that would add the new position of Director of Scholarships, state that an individual may hold only one vote at the Convention, describe the responsibilities of the Director of Scholarships, define the Scholarship Fund, and define the Scholarship Program. He moved, seconded by A.J. Flowerday (MI I), to amend Art. IV, Bylaw III, and to add a new Article and a new Bylaw XI. He said that this package of amendments would place the Scholarship Program on the same level as the Fellowship Program. (The detailed changes are in the minutes of the Third Business Meeting.) A motion to table by Director Frost, seconded by M.T. Pittard (UT B), failed. K.J. Hoover (MD G) inquired if the Scholarship Fund had already been established, and Mr. Hickling replied that it had. Dr. J.R. Luchini (EFF) said that the proposal contained two ideas and requested that the proposal be divided; Mr. Hickling divided the question.

The Second Business Meeting was recessed at 9:02 a.m. and reconvened at 9:14 a.m.

S.D. Jennings-King (D11D) inquired if Director of Fellowships D.S. Pierre were opposed to the change. Dr. S.L. Holl (Fell. Bd.) said that the Fellowship Board is far from being overwhelmed by its work and can easily handle the workload, which is not an issue. Two directors are not needed, but the Scholarship Fund is another matter. Mr. Lapierre said that separate committees were desired, but they could be comprised of the same individuals. J.B. Bost (LA D) said that the committee believes that Mr. Pierre is in favor. Vice
President D'Avignon said that the change would provide flexibility for the Executive Council when the workload did increase; he had spoken with Mr. Pierre who is not opposed, but feels that two boards are unnecessary; the intent is for the same four members to serve on both boards. T.K. Stone (CO B) inquired if there would be extra costs if the amendments were ratified and if members of the board were the same individuals; Mr. Hickling said that there would be no extra costs in that case. Dr. Holl asked if the change were ratified, how soon would it be implemented? Mr. D'Avignon said that it could be implemented immediately after ratification, but if not ratified, establishing the new board could take up to two years. Dr. H.A. Hegna (OH N Adv.) noted that the package would also formally define the Scholarship Program. President Green inquired if an officer who served both director positions would have two votes. After limited discussion, Chairman Hickling tabled the motion which would establish a Director of Scholarships, Scholarship Board, and Scholarship Fund.

Chairman Hickling called for discussion on the topic of restricting the number of officer votes. Dr. Luchini said that World War II required alumni to carry multiple votes in order to establish a quorum and that there was value in allowing multiple votes. In response to a question on proxies, Parliamentarian Johnson noted that Const. Art. III forbids proxies and that he had voted two times on written ballots at previous Conventions when he had two votes. Dr. Luchini noted that some alumni in the past had held more than one position, but that chapters had single votes. H.H. Houh (D1D) spoke against the change because a person who is a District Director and holds another office should not lose a vote; he asked that an officer who would hold the positions of Director of Fellowships and Director of Scholarships be limited to one vote. In response to a question about dual positions, Secretary Froula said that no current officers hold dual votes and that the most recent situation was approximately ten years ago. Chairman Hickling tabled the motion on restricting officer votes. In response to an inquiry whether the motion should be committed, Chairman Hickling said that either action would have the same effect.

The Second Business Meeting was adjourned at 9:45 a.m.

********************

Meetings of Image Review Focus Groups and consultants were held in the Greco Room, at 8:00 a.m., 1:30 p.m., and 4:30 p.m. Three groups of 10-12 students met with a market-research facilitator to evaluate the Association's image materials. Student opinions and recommendations expressed during the 90-minute sessions will be used to develop several new image materials which will be tested at selected 2003 District Conferences.

The Convention group photograph was taken at 10:30 a.m. in bright sunshine in the Wintergarden Atrium. Photographs were delivered to the delegates after the final banquet.

Interactive Chapter Exchanges (ICE) were held starting at 10:50 a.m. in rooms of the hotel. Sixteen small-group exchange seminars were conducted, each with a District Director and a trained Engineering Futures Facilitator serving as moderators. Booklets containing background notes on the subjects of eligibility, election, and initiation of new members, of chapter management and projects, of the “Chapter Growth Cycle,” and of group analytical problem solving were provided.

Lunch was served in the Columbus Ballroom of the hotel at 12:00 noon, and seating was by ICE Groups. The sponsorship of Lockheed Martin for the meal was acknowledged. A total of 434 people enjoyed the chicken entree. After the meal, Mr. Froula presented a summary of the Executive Director's Report for 2001-02, which was given to each Convention registrant (and appeared in the Fall 2002 BENT).

Secretary Froula and Vice President D'Avignon presented 43 Secretary’s Commendations for perfection of Headquarters reports and timely payment of fees in 2001-02 to: California Nu, California Rho, Colorado Beta, Florida Delta, Illinois Alpha, Indiana Delta, Iowa Beta, Louisiana Gamma, Michigan Alpha, Michigan Iota, Mississippi Alpha, New York Iota, New York Nu, New York Pi, Ohio Delta, Ohio Zeta, Ohio Nu, Oregon Gamma, Pennsylvania Epsilon, Rhode Island Alpha, South Carolina Alpha, South Dakota Beta, Texas Beta, Texas Delta, Texas Eta, Utah Gamma, Vermont Beta,Wisconsin Delta and the 15 chapters listed below.

Secretary Froula and Vice President D’Avignon presented letters of recognition and Chapter Performance Scholarships of $500 to the engineering schools of the following: California Alpha, California Zeta, California Psi, Iowa Alpha, Maryland Beta, Michigan Epsilon, New York Kappa, New York Tau, Ohio Iota, Pennsylvania Theta, South Dakota Alpha, West Virginia Alpha,Wisconsin Alpha, Wisconsin Epsilon, and Wyoming Alpha.

As part of the Chapter Development Program, Assistant Secretary Hawks presented information about the 10-week membership process.

Interactive Chapter Committee and Engineering Futures Meetings reconvened at 1:30 p.m.

A refreshment beverage break was provided at 3:10 p.m., compliments of General Motors.

District Meetings reconvened at 3:20 p.m.

Dinner was held at 6:45 p.m. in the Columbus Ballroom; seating was by committee grouping. Curtis D. Gomulinski, District 7 Director, was master of ceremonies. Most of the total of 435 people enjoyed the whitefish entree. The chapter advisors at the Convention were specially recognized by Secretary Froula and the delegates.

Secretary Froula and Vice President D'Avignon presented 28 Chapter Project Awards for excellence in project work during 2001-02 to: Alabama Delta, Arizona Gamma, Florida Eta, Maryland Delta, Michigan Iota, Nevada Beta, New York Theta, Ohio Beta, Pennsylvania Epsilon, Puerto Rico Alpha, South Carolina Alpha, Tennessee Alpha, West Virginia Alpha, and to the 15 chapters listed below.

Secretary Froula and Vice President D’Avignon presented letters of recognition and Chapter Performance Scholarships of $500 each to the engineering schools of the following 15 chapters that had won three consecutive chapter project awards: District of Columbia Alpha, Florida Alpha, Florida Beta, Indiana Delta, Louisiana Gamma, Maryland Beta, Michigan Gamma, Michigan Epsilon, Michigan Theta, New York Kappa, New York Tau, Ohio Iota, South Dakota Alpha, Vermont Beta, and Wyoming Alpha.

Secretary Froula presented recognition plaques to Connecticut Gamma, Iowa Alpha, and Pennsylvania Alpha which successfully nominated the 2002 Laureates.

Vice President D'Avignon presented the Executive Council Membership Commendation to South Carolina Alpha, which had successfully used the dean's letter to parents of electees. Its Chief Advisor worked to obtain the eligibility list during the first week of the semester, and he and the university president sent email messages to all eligible candidates. Chapter members conducted a phone-a-thon to follow up with candidates who did not respond, and all officers practiced a PowerPoint presentation and delivered it to the candidates during the orientation. The percentage of initiates rose from 10% in Fall 2000 to 53% in Fall 2001 with 70 initiates.

Completing the Chapter Development Program, Assistant Secretary Hawks stressed the importance of following up with eligible candidates who did not respond to the invitations to the orientation meeting and to electees who did not respond to the invitation to membership. Director of Communications and Development P.B. McDaniel presented the new Tau Beta Pi informational CD/Video.

Committee, Engineering Futures, and the Advisors/Alumnus Meetings reconvened at 8:15 p.m. along with ICE Special Projects meetings. Refreshments were served at 9:45 p.m., compliments of General Motors.

Vice President D'Avignon hosted a breakfast meeting in the hotel at 7:15 a.m. on October 5 with delegates which plan to host the District Conferences in the Spring of 2003.

*************************

THIRD BUSINESS MEETING
Saturday, October 5, Columbus Ballroom, Marriott Renaissance Center

Chairman Hickling called the meeting to order at 8:04 a.m. Secretary Froula reported that 230 voting delegates and national officers were registered, thus fixing the number of votes required to pass various items of business.

Continuing the Report of the Committee on Chapter and Association Financial Affairs, T.J. Baldwin (NV A), Chair, said that his group had completed its work on four charges. His group had reviewed the auditor's and Treasurer's reports for 2001-02 and found both documents to be satisfactory to the best of its knowledge. This group had reviewed the chapter accounts-receivable and had met with all delegates at the Convention from chapters that had a debt to the Association in excess of $300, agreed on an action plan with each chapter on a case-by-case basis, and delivered those recommendations to the Secretary-Treasurer to follow up on these actions. His committee recommends that the Executive Council pay the on-site expenses, in addition to current travel reimbursements, for one non-voting delegate per chapter. The goal would be to increase Convention attendance per chapter which could lead to an increase in chapter activities and, in the future, may improve the quality of each chapter. His group recommends a review of this decision at the 2006 Convention to determine whether the goals have been met as a result of the increased reimbursement and whether Tau Beta Pi is able to pay the additional Convention expenses. He moved, seconded by A.J. Flowerday (MI I), that the expense reimbursement allowance for the 2003 Convention be the same as those for the 2002 Convention. This policy provides driving reimbursement of $.25 per mile plus $.05 per mile for additional non-voting delegates (3 maximum) and $42 lodging en route only; flying reimbursement for a 14-day advance-purchase ticket for a delegate and 20% of a 14-day advance-purchase airline ticket for one non-voting delegate per collegiate chapter, for a maximal reimbursement of $200; meal reimbursement for delegates only of $5, $6, and $8 for breakfast, lunch, and dinner en route (limited to three meals each way), terminal expenses and $5 for on-site breakfasts at the Convention. He said that based on the experiences of the diverse residences of his committee members, his group expects that the expenses in Lubbock, TX, should be no more than those in Detroit, MI. N.A. Westfahl (AR A) moved, seconded by an unidentified delegate, to amend the policy to $.05 per mile for "each additional member-passenger...." Without further discussion, the amendment passed on a voice vote, and the motion passed on a voice vote.

Continuing the Report of the Committee on Rituals, Director of Fellowship Hirsch reminded the delegates to attend the model initiation at 2:00 p.m. on Saturday.

Continuing the Report of the Committee on Convention Site, Z.M. Thomas (NY B), Chair, thanked Colorado Beta and Utah Alpha/Beta/Gamma for presenting well prepared bids. All presenters were enthusiastic. His group recommends that future Convention bids present projected travel costs in a standard format, to include flight prices to the proposed airport from each airport from which delegates fly. These prices should be weighed by the number of delegates who would use each airport, and Headquarters should provide bidding chapters with the numbers of chapters per airport. On behalf of his committee, he moved, seconded by M.T. Pittard (UT B), to accept the Convention bid of the Utah Alpha, Utah Beta, and Utah Gamma Chapters to host the 2005 National Convention in Salt Lake City. He reviewed important factors in the decision, such as proximity to a major airport. T.K. Stone (CO B), moved, seconded by S.M. Young (UT A), that Denver, CO, be the alternate location with Colorado Beta as host if the choice is deemed unacceptable by the Executive Council. Mr. Pittard noted that the Executive Council determined that the original hotel selected for the 2004 Convention was unacceptable and questioned that if a similar motion had been made in 2001, would the Council have chosen an alternate site? Mr. Hickling said not necessarily. J.R. Pierce (MA E) said that both bids were similar and he would endorse the amendment. The amendment passed, on a standing vote with 144 in favor and 54 opposed. Mr. Pittard complimented Colorado Beta for its spirited competition and stated that Utah Beta supports Denver as an alternate site. The motion passed on a voice vote.

Continuing the Report of the Committee on Candidate and Electee Duties (ad hoc), A.T. Barnes (NV B), Chair, said that her group had reworded the tabled amendment from the Second Business Meeting and requested that a substitute motion, below, be allowed which he read. Chairman Hickling ruled without objection that a substitute motion would be acceptable. She moved, seconded by A.J. Flowerday (MI I), to take from the table the substitute motion. The motion was removed from the table on a voice vote and is stated below.

Bylaw VII
Initiation
SECTION 7.02. Electee Duties. (a) While duties for the electees are permissible, they shall be limited to tasks and duties that are a test of an electee’s intellectuality and mentality rather than physical strength and endurance and shall not consume an inordinate amount of time to the possible detriment of required college work. Physical violence, offense to dignity or decency, or public exercises that make demean the electee ridiculous in any way shall not be permitted. The expense of any electee activity shall be carefully considered and not be prohibitory to the Chapter or the electee.

(b). If an electee objects to the required duties and the chapter cannot resolve the objection, the electee may appeal to the Advisory Board of the Chapter. If the electee is not satisfied with the outcome, the electee will be given contact information for the District Director, who will advise the parties on resolution.
(Underlined words added; struck words deleted.)

Ms. Barnes said that her committee unanimously supports the change, that the chapter would determine the time limit, and that the chapter would be the final authority. T.K. Stone (CO B) moved, seconded by D.S. Kaplan (PA G), to amend the motion to add a sentence at the end of (b): "Should the electee, District Director, and chapter not reach an acceptable resolution, the electee may appeal to the Executive Council." He said that final authority should be a party outside the disagreement. After extensive discussion by numerous delegates, the question was called without objection, and the amendment failed on a voice vote. D.S. Kaplan (PA G) moved, seconded by M.G. Miller (MI B), to add the phrase "and inform the Executive Council of the dialogue." He said that it is important to make the Council aware of these situations. After further extensive discussion, the question was called without objection, and the amendment failed on a show of hands. The question was called, and debate was ended on a show of hands. The Bylaw amendment passed on a show of hands with 186 in favor and 19 opposed, and is effective immediately.

Continuing the Report of the Committee on Curriculum Eligibility (ad hoc), A.J. Flowerday (MI I), Chair, thanked his members for their integrity, professionalism, and excellent work and provided a brief background on the topic. In 1999, Kansas Gamma requested the help of the Executive Council and Convention in determining the eligibility of computer science majors. The 2001 Convention examined this issue and realized that eligibility issues extend beyond that field. His group was charged to consider the eligibility for membership in Tau Beta Pi of students in all programs that are obviously not engineering programs, especially focusing on the need to resolve the issue of computer science. This group examined a vast amount of information, including ABET documentation pertaining to engineering accreditation, and sought the advice of deans, faculty, Councillors, advisors, and other members. J.T. Bast (OH B) presented a proposal to amend Const. Art. VIII, Sec. 2(a), (b), and (m), to redefine the eligible curricula for undergraduate students. He moved, seconded by P.O. Heiser (MO D) to amend Const. Art. VIII as shown below.

SECTION 2. Eligibility of Undergraduates. (a) To be eligible for election, the candidate shall be a student pursuing a regular, undergraduate engineering day curriculum of the institution. A regular, undergraduate engineering day curriculum must meet the curriculum criteria set forth by the Engineering Accreditation Commission, or its successor(s), of the Accreditation Board for Engineering & Technology (ABET). Individual programs need not be ABET-accredited to be considered. Students pursuing equivalent curricula in evening (night) school, when such curricula are administered by the dean, or equivalent, and faculty of the college or school of engineering of the institution, may be eligible to election after a five-sevenths favorable vote of the Advisory Board and approval by the Executive Council. Candidates for membership shall meet the scholarship provisions of this Constitution and shall have exemplary character as enunciated in the Eligibility Code of the Association.
(b) Students of other engineering curricula may be eligible for election as undergraduate members if and when their curricula are administered by the dean, or equivalent, and faculty of the college or school or unit of engineering of the institution. In the event that these curricula are administered by some other unit of the institution, or jointly by the engineering unit and some other unit, but the basic engineering training is given by the faculty of engineering, such students Students may be considered eligible for election, and may be considered by departments, after such procedure has curricula have received the three-fourths favorable vote of the active Chapter membership eligible to vote thereon (see Const. Art. VI, Sec. 1), the five-sevenths favorable vote of the Advisory Board, and the written approval of the Executive Council. Engineering technology is not to be considered as an eligible curriculum for membership. Such curricula that meet these criteria shall be considered engineering curricula.
(m) The cases of students whose eligibility is in doubt because of irregular standing or curriculum shall be referred to the Advisory Board of the Chapter or and to the Executive Council for the determination of the terms and times of eligibility.
(Underlined words added; struck words deleted.)

Mr. Bast read the first sentence of the Preamble, said there is no easy way for Tau Beta Pi to address chapters that initiate members from ineligible curricula, that the amendment to Sec. 2(m) would permit consistency, and that the definition of engineering should be that of the national accrediting authority. N.A. Westfahl (AR A) moved, seconded by D.S. Kaplan (PA G), to limit debate to thirty minutes, with a maximum of 1.5 minutes per speaker. The motion passed on a show of hands. J.G. Dabling (D13 D) asked if engineering technology would now be an eligible curriculum. P.J. Rodriguez (OH L) said that it would not be permitted because it does not fall under the Engineering Accreditation Commission of ABET and it probably would not win the approval of the chapter, its advisory board, and the Council. In response to a question, Secretary Froula said that the Council would probably review the situation of an institution at which all engineering programs lost accreditation and that its charter might be in jeopardy. After discussion of what criteria the Council might use to approve chapter bylaws that listed eligible curricula, President-elect Ohland replied that the Council would use EAC/ABET criteria as would be defined in Sec. 2(a).

Chairman Hickling ruled that the meeting be recessed, an attempt to overrule him failed on a voice vote, and the Third Business Meeting was recessed at 9:50 a.m. and reconvened at 10:10 a.m.

P.O. Heiser (MO D) noted that engineering technololgy was under the approval of the Technology Accreditation Commission of ABET. Director of Rituals Hirsch moved to divide the question into the issue of eligibility in Sec. 2(a) and (b) and the issue of approval by the Council in Sec. 2(m). Chairman Hickling ruled that the remaining time would be used on the first issue, and the motion was divided without objection. Dr. A.E Toy (MI I Adv.) stated that ABET has four national commissions to define and approve various curricula and that the commissions are comprised of engineers who are able to define engineering. B.T. Merriman (NC D) said that this issue is not related to a forthcoming discussion on defining eligible curricula in chapter bylaws. A motion to extend debate for thirty minutes and to alternate pro and con discussions failed on a standing vote with 110 in favor and 86 opposed. A.J. Ricketts (DC A) appealed the Chair's decision that the time limit had expired and the attempt to overrule the Chair failed on a voice vote. Dr. Toy said that Sec. 2(a) defines engineering curricula per strict guidelines and Sec. (b) defines a process for other curricula. A motion to extend debate for five minutes failed on a show of hands. The amendment to Const. Art. VIII, Sec. (a) and (b), passed on a standing vote by the required 3/4 majority with 183 in favor and 28 opposed, but final approval is subject to chapter ratification.

Discussion returned to the amendment to Sec. 2(m). Director Hirsch said that removing the word or eliminates the choice of who decides which irregular curricula are permitted and adding the word and clarifies the procedure. Debate was ended on a show of hands, and the amendment to Const. Art. VIII, Sec. (m), passed on a standing vote by the required 3/4 majority with 196 in favor and 14 opposed, but final approval is subject to chapter ratification. Mr. Flowerday said that his group requests that the Executive Council take the necessary steps to bring all chapters into compliance with Art. VIII of the Constitution of this Association.

Continuing the Report of the Committee on Constitution and Bylaws, R.R. Lapierre (MA Z), Chair, moved, seconded by E.S. Miller (OH I), to amend Const. Art. VIII to add new paragraphs Sec. 2(f) and 3(b) as shown below.

SECTION 2(f) A chapter must list in the Bylaws of the Chapter all curricula that it deems worthy to qualify a candidate for eligiblity. See Bylaw V, Sec. 5.03.
(All subsequent items re-lettered appropriately.)

SECTION 3(b) A chapter must list in the Bylaws of the Chapter all graduate-degree programs that it deems worthy to qualify a candidate for eligibility. See Bylaw V, Sec. 5.03.
(The previously existing text of Section 3 is now lettered Section 3 (a).)

(Underlined words added; struck words deleted.)

Mr. Lapierre said that this change would define the membership practices of chapters. J.M. Nolan (CA L) said this requirement could complicate operations and make a chapter look bad, but P.D. Schmid (PA A) suggested that this could prevent problems and errors. T.K. Stone said that the quorum requirements for electing new members and amending chapter bylaws are the same, and it would be beneficial to update all changes in the bylaws. D.A. Schaefgen said that the national Headquarters is extremely helpful in resolving chapter problems. After debate ended on a show of hands, the amendment passed on a standing vote by the required 3/4 majority with 193 in favor and 17 opposed, but final approval is subject to chapter ratification. Mr. Lapierre said that his group recommends that implementation of the requirement to document eligible curricula in chapter bylaws be completed by April 1, 2004.

T.J. Baldwin (NV A) moved, seconded by C.P. Petrie (IA B), to suspend the rules which prevent extending the Third Business Meeting. The motion was carried on a voice vote.

Mr. Lapierre moved, seconded by S.M. Young (UT A), to remove from the table and substitute language for the amendment to Const. Art. III, Sec. 2(a), which would read:

SECTION 2. Convention. (a) The Convention shall meet annually except as provided in Sections 5(f) and (g) of this Article and shall be composed of one delegate from each Chapter (Collegiate and Alumnus), the members of the Executive Council, the Secretary-Treasurer, the Assistant Secretary-Treasurer, the Director of Rituals, the Director of Fellowships, the Director of Engineering Futures, and one Director per District who shall be entitled to one vote each. Proxies shall not be permitted. A Chapter delegate shall represent only one Chapter. An individual person shall not be entitled to more than one vote. Representatives of a majority of the Collegiate Chapters shall constitute a quorum.
(Underlined words added.)

Chairman Hickling ruled that the substitute motion be allowed because the intent is the same as the language presented in the Second Business Meeting. Mr. Lapierre said that his committee desires that one person have no more than one vote. Debate was ended on a show of hands, and the amendment passed on a standing vote by the required 3/4 majority with 188 in favor and 22 opposed, but final approval is subject to chapter ratification.

Mr. Lapierre reviewed the tabled proposal to add the position of Director of Scholarships and to define the Scholarship Fund and asked the Chair to consider it as a substitute motion, which he did. Mr. Lapierre moved, seconded by P.D. Schmid (PA A), to remove from the table and substitute language for the amendment to establish the Scholarship Program, Scholarship Fund, and the position of Director of Scholarships, which would read:
Article III
Government of the Association

SECTION 2. Convention. (a) The Convention shall meet annually except as provided in Sections 5(f) and (g) of this Article and shall be composed of one delegate from each Chapter (Collegiate and Alumnus), the members of the Executive Council, the Secretary-Treasurer, the Assistant Secretary-Treasurer, the Director of Rituals, the Director of Fellowships, the Director of Scholarships, the Director of Engineering Futures, and one Director per District who shall be entitled to one vote each. Proxies shall not be permitted. A Chapter delegate shall represent only one Chapter. An individual may hold only one vote. Representatives of a majority of the Collegiate Chapters shall constitute a quorum.

Article IV
Association Officers
SECTION 1. Association Officers. The officers of the Association shall be a President, a Vice-President, a Secretary-Treasurer, an Assistant Secretary-Treasurer, a Director of Rituals, a Director of Fellowships, a Director of Scholarships, a Director of Engineering Futures, and District Directors.
SECTION 2. Designation and Duties. (a) The President ... head of the Association.
(f) The Director of Rituals, Director of Fellowships, Director of Scholarships, and Director of Engineering Futures shall be appointed by the Executive Council to serve a term of four years beginning on July 1st after the Executive Council takes office. The District ... travel authorized by the Executive Council.
(2) The Director of Fellowships shall manage the Fellowship Program of the Association. The Director of Fellowships shall be a member of and shall chair the Fellowship Board. The Fellowship Board shall consist of three alumnus members in addition to the Director of Fellowships. The Director of Fellowships shall recommend to the Executive Council the appointment of one member to the Board each year for a three-year term, the term of office to commence on August 1st. The three appointed members of the Board preferably shall be practicing engineers, each a graduate of a different college or university, and from different branches of the profession. A Board member may be reappointed. The Board shall review all applications for Tau Beta Pi fellowships, and shall select those to whom a fellowship shall be awarded in accordance with the number of fellowships authorized and funds made available by the Executive Council. See Bylaws III, Sec. 3.04, and X.
(3) The Director of Scholarships shall manage the Scholarship Program of the Association. The Director of Scholarships shall be a member of and shall chair the Scholarship Board. The Scholarship Board shall consist of three alumnus members in addition to the Director of Scholarships. The Director of Scholarships shall recommend to the Executive Council the appointment of one member to the Scholarship Board each year for a three-year term, the term of office to commence on August 1st. The three appointed members of the Scholarship Board preferably shall be practicing engineers, each a graduate of a different college or university, and from different branches of the profession. A Scholarship Board member may be reappointed. The Scholarship Board shall review all applications for Tau Beta Pi scholarships, and shall select those to whom a scholarship shall be awarded in accordance with the number of scholarships authorized and funds made available by the Executive Council. See Bylaws III, Sec. 3.0*, and XI. (Re-number subsequent sections.)

Article New
Scholarship Fund
Section 1. Basis and Use. The Association shall maintain a Fund to be known as the Tau Beta Pi Scholarship Fund, the principal of which shall be composed of moneys transferred to it by the Executive Council. The income from this Fund shall be used for Scholarship stipends in accordance with the direction of the Executive Council. See Bylaw XI.
Section 2. Administration. The Scholarship Fund shall be administered by the trustee in accordance with Article XVI of this Constitution. (Re-number subsequent articles.)

Bylaw III
National Officers
SECTION 3.04. Director of Fellowships. The Director of Fellowships shall establish rules and regulations relative to the award of fellowships, the method of consideration of candidates, and the operation of the fellowship plan, subject to the Constitution and Bylaws of the Association and to the approval of the Executive Council. The Director of Fellowships shall provide each member of the Executive Council with a copy of all rules and regulations. See Const. Art. IV, Sec. 2(f)(2).
SECTION 3.05. Director of Scholarships. The Director of Scholarships shall establish rules and regulations relative to the award of scholarships, the method of consideration of candidates, and the operation of the scholarship plan, subject to the Constitution and Bylaws of the Association and to the approval of the Executive Council. The Director of Scholarships shall provide each member of the Executive Council with a copy of all rules and regulations. See Const. Art. IV, Sec. 2(f)(3).
SECTION 3.0506. District Directors. The District Directors shall meet with the representatives of the Chapters at the Convention; shall encourage uniform interpretation of the Constitution and Bylaws by the Chapters; and shall determine weaknesses of the Chapters in their Districts and focus resources to correct them. See Const. Art. IV, Sec. 2(f)(3).
SECTION 3.0607. Director of Engineering Futures. The Director of Engineering Futures shall coordinate and select the content of the Engineering Futures curriculum and the schedule of presentations by facilitators to the chapters. See Const. Art. IV, Sec. 2(f)(4).

Bylaw XI (new, re-number others)
Scholarships
Section 11.01 Establishment. The Association shall maintain a program of scholarships insofar as, in the opinion of the Executive Council, the financial condition of the Association permits. The Executive Council, with the advice of the Director of Scholarships, shall determine the amount of each scholarship and the number of scholarships to be awarded each year, based on the total moneys available from income on the Scholarship Fund and the general financial condition of the Association. The Executive Council may use other funds of the Association if such use of funds appears to be warranted in view of other financial commitments of the Association. The Executive Council shall advise the Director of Scholarships not later than the first of November of each year the number and amount of scholarships that will be available for the following year. A recipient of a scholarship must enroll in full-time academic work within twelve months after the scholarship has been awarded. See C. IV, Sec. 2(f) (2).
Section 11.02. Objective. The object of the Scholarship Program shall be to advance the interest of the engineering profession, to stimulate undergraduate study and to recognize deserving members of the Association for demonstrating outstanding scholarship and exemplary character.
Section 11.03. Eligibility Conditions. (a) Scholarships shall be granted to members of the Association strictly for undergraduate work towards a bachelor's degree. The undergraduate study shall be in a program for which students are eligible for membership in Tau Beta Pi at an institution with an active Tau Beta Pi chapter. The scholar shall pursue full-time study for the full college year of the institution at which the scholarship year will be spent. If a scholar graduates prior to the end of the scholarship year, the remaining scholarship shall not be awarded.
(b) A scholarship shall not be awarded to a member who has previously had a Tau Beta Pi Scholarship.
Section 11.04. Selection Criteria. Scholarships shall be awarded on the basis of the applicant's scholastic attainment, unselfish activity of a nature described in the Tau Beta Pi Eligibility Code, and references. Financial need may be considered in the awarding of scholarships.
Section 11.05. Certificate. Each recipient of a Tau Beta Pi Scholarship shall receive a certificate at the beginning of the scholarship year, or shortly thereafter, which shall set forth the full name of the recipient, Chapter, the institution name, and the year for which the scholarship is awarded. The Director of Scholarships, the President, and the Executive Director of the Association shall sign the certificate.
Section 11.06. Resignation. If a scholar does not continue a degree program for any reason, the scholar shall promptly resign the scholarship and shall relinquish the financial claim on the Association one month after submitting the resignation. If a scholar encounters unusual circumstances that would force resignation, the scholar may appeal to the Executive Council for reconsideration of the scholarship plan.
Section 11.07. Payment. The stipend shall be the same for all scholarships awarded in any one year, but may be changed from year to year. The Executive Director of the Association shall pay to each of the scholars the amount of the stipend in a manner approved by the Executive Council. See Bylaw III, Sec. 3.01 (g) (8).
Section 11.08. Rules for Application. The Director of Scholarships may make such rules and regulations relative to the application for scholarships, the consideration of candidates, and the operation of the scholarship plan, subject to the Constitution and Bylaws and to the approval of the Executive Council.
(Underlined words added; struck words deleted.)

Mr. Lapierre said that it was time to make the Scholarship Fund and Scholarship Program a formal part of the Constitution and Bylaws. Discussion followed on whether or not a Director of Scholarships would be needed now, that the Council would like the program to expand exponentially, whether we should pursue more efficient procedures, whether the title could be combined to a Director of Fellowships/Scholarships, and whether the program could be renamed the Fellowship/Scholarship Program. The question was called, but debate was extended on a show of hands. D.S. Kaplan (PA G) inquired what the Fellowship Board wants. Dr. Holl said that a new Director of Scholarships is not required. A.J. Pinkus (D2 D) said that it should not cost $5,000 per year to establish a Scholarship Board. J.M. Nolan (CA L) said that this estimate resulted from an approximate cost of $1,000 per person to attend a national meeting. S.M. Kolakowski (NY T) moved, seconded by C.P. Petrie (IA B), to divide the question into a motion regarding the Scholarship Fund/Program and another defining the Director of Fellowships/Scholarships. The motion passed on a standing vote with 99 in favor and 92 opposed. After being overruled, Chairman Hickling asked that debate proceed on establishment of the Scholarship Program and Scholarship Fund. Mr. Lapierre reviewed the proposed new Article and new Bylaw XI. A motion to limit debate to six minutes passed on a voice vote. Mr. Lapierre noted that the Scholarship Fund already exists and is operating as proposed in the new Article. Without further discussion, the amendment passed on a standing vote by the required 3/4 majority with 199 in favor and 1 opposed, but final approval is subject to chapter ratification.

Discussion resumed on establishment of a Scholarship Board and Director of Scholarships. Mr. Lapierre said that his committee wished to establish a Director of Scholarships and Scholarship Board. Chairman Hickling ruled that debate be limited to six minutes without objection. A. Shertok (MI G) moved, seconded by W.M. Adams (AL D), to direct the Executive Council to refer the question of establishing the position of Director of Scholarships to the 2003 Convention. An objection to the motion was defeated on a show of hands, and debate was closed on a show of hands. The motion passed on a standing vote with 99 in favor and 97 opposed. M.G. Miller (MI B) moved, seconded by M.T. Pittard (UT B), to recount by roll call, the motion failed on a show of hands.

Chairman Hickling ruled that the three remaining agenda items would be postponed until the Awards Banquet. The Third Business Meeting was recessed at 12:20 p.m. and reconvened at 7:12 p.m.

Continuing the Report of the Resolutions Committee, J.C. Cheung (CA A), Chair, said that her group had reviewed the Distinguished Alumnus Program and had recommendations for the Executive Council: 1) Extend the Tau Beta Pi Distinguished Alumnus Award Program trial period; 2) Increase chapter incentive for nomination of the award recipient—a $500 award is suggested to be given to the nominating chapter for the benefit of the chapter, under the direction of the advisory board; 3) Simplify the application process: “The current résumé of the nominee with a choice of his/her reference.” (Part 5) should become optional; the overall application process should be modeled after the eminent-engineer nomination procedure; and 4) Further increase of publicity is needed—a notice of the program should be sent to chapter presidents and chapter advisors, separately from other information; multiple copies should be sent, similar to the flyers that are sent for the Laureate, Scholarship, and Fellowship awards, so that interested members may easily obtain copies. She read Sections II and III of the Resolutions of the Convention. Committee members then presented two comedy skits based upon Star Wars, Lame Duck Green, and the Renaissance Center.

Chairman Hickling asked for any items of New Business. - E.D. Basta (OHNC AC) presented a Chapter Advisor Improvement Initiative, and he moved, seconded by B.A. Shilling (CO Z), that the Executive Council: 1.) Form a Chapter Advisor Committee consisting of all attending advisors, starting at the National Convention in 2003; and 2.) Schedule a Chapter Advisor ICE Group, starting at the National Convention in 2003. (All meetings are to be scheduled simultaneously with other committee and ICE seminars.) Prof. R.V. Pieri (ND A Adv.) said that improving the capability of the advisor core would be helpful in improving the chapters. He thanked the Council for its improvements to date and said that a formal structure would be useful. The resolution passed on a voice vote.

The Third Business Meeting was adjourned at 7:37 p.m.

**************************************

A buffet luncheon was held in the McGregor Center on the WSU campus at 12:40 p.m.

The Model Initiation was conducted at 2:15 p.m. in the Community Arts Auditorium on the campus. The Committee on Rituals and members of the host chapter had organized this ceremony. Director of Rituals Hirsch explained to the delegates the importance of proper preparation for and conduction of the initiation ceremony, the purpose of the model ceremony, proper dress, and prompt reporting to Headquarters. The initiation team consisted of Executive Director Froula, Vice President D'Avignon, Associate Dean Steven O. Salley, B. Jancevski (MI E), District 7 Director Curtis D. Gomulinski, Director Hirsch, and Rituals Committee members E.J. Iyoha (CA U), B.J. Zeskind (MA B), D.K. Zoldos (MI E), A.J. Flowerday (MI I), T.L. Morse (NY I), D.A. Bailey (OR B), and J.A. Johannemann (SC G). The model initiation brought into membership in the Association seven student, one eminent, and two alumnus members of Ohio Gamma, four student members of Michigan Iota, one alumnus member of Ohio Zeta, and one eminent member of Ohio Gamma.

Secretary Froula met with successful petitioners at 3:30 p.m. in the hotel.

The Initiation and Awards Banquet was held in the Columbus Ballroom of the hotel at 6:30 p.m. Heather Havens-Beardsley, California Mu Alumnus visitor, was mistress of ceremonies; she welcomed all delegates and initiates. Councillor Atkins welcomed the new members of Tau Beta Pi, encouraged the delegates to make a difference in society and to realize that they can become whatever they want to be, reminded them that membership implies responsibility, and introduced the Tau Beta Pi Historical Video. The Final Business Meeting was held as recorded below, after which the Convention received heartfelt messages. The total of 447 enjoyed the filet mignon dinner entree, sponsored for the delegates by Duke Energy.

Dr. George Dambach, WSU vice president-research, congratulated the award winners and the hard-working students who gave their time to attend the meeting and stated that WSU was delighted to host this Convention. Dr. Ralph H. Kummler, interim dean of engineering, said that his college is proud to be the home of Michigan Epsilon, recognized the host representatives, hoped that the engineering infrastructure would rise to meet them, and wished all a great trip home. Abha Tiwari thanked all of the delegates for attending, noted that Michigan Epsilon has 30 members proving that a small chapter can host the Convention, and encouraged other small chapters to submit bids in the future.

President M.W. Ohland responded for the Association, recognized all of the various groups of members and friends, and stated that the Four Corner Executive Council looks forward to leading the Society during the next four years.

********************

FINAL BUSINESS MEETING
Saturday, October 5, Initiation and Awards Banquet
Cartier Ballroom, Marriott Renaissance Hotel

Chairman Hickling took charge of the Final Business Meeting on the banquet program at 8:05 p.m.

President Green announced that the Executive Council had made three GIG Chapter Project Grants for 2002-03 to Iowa Alpha ($715) for its “Engineering & the Environment Display Project," to Maryland Beta ($750) for its “Robotics Exploration Project," and to Maryland Delta ($250) for its “Engineering Day Outreach Program" and presented plaques to the winning chapters.

President Green made the presentation of the 2002 Tau Beta Pi National Outstanding Advisor Award to Dr. Larry A. Simonson, SD A '69, P.E., South Dakota Alpha Advisor, and recognized the excellent performance of the chapter under his effective long-term guidance. He presented two checks of $1,000 for Dr. Simonson and for the dean's discretionary fund at the South Dakota School of Mines & Technology to Dr. Simonson.

President Green made a presentation of the 2002 Tau Beta Pi Distinguished Alumnus Award to Dr. Lyle D. Feisel, IA A '61, P.E., retired dean emeritus of SUNY Binghamton, read his citation of accomplishments, and presented him with a plaque. (A $500 scholarship had previously been sent to the New York Tau Chapter). Dr. Lyle D. Feisel spoke to the delegates of the importance of making good decisions early in their careers.

President Green made the presentations to the 2002 Tau Beta Pi Laureates. He introduced Devon J. Battaglia, PA A ’03, recognized his contributions to the performing arts, and presented him with a Laureate plaque and $2,500 award.

President Green presented Sarah T. Bauer, IA A ’03, lauded her achievements in musical performance, and presented her with a Laureate plaque and $2,500 award.

President Green presented Erik C. Porse, CT G ’02, lauded his service to the policy and law-making community as a WISE intern, and presented him with a Laureate plaque and $2,500 award.

Continuing the Report of the Committee on Awards, B.A. Shilling (CO Z), Chair, reviewed the criteria for the R.H. Nagel Most Improved Chapter Award, mentioned the basis of improvement of the following chapters and their excellent project activity, and presented an honorable mention to New York Nu and the Most Improved Chapter Award to Nevada Beta. (Plaques will be prepared and delivered to the winners later.)

G.D. Martin (NM B), vice chair, reviewed the criteria, history, and the importance of the reports and documentation for the R.C. Matthews Outstanding Chapter Award. He congratulated all chapters that conducted projects last year. He presented the honorable mention to Wyoming Alpha, noting its numerous extensive community service projects, and the Outstanding Chapter Award to Maryland Beta. He complimented the winner’s many community service projects, extensive community outreach, and high-level performance by all of its members. (Plaques will be prepared and delivered to the winners later.)

Continuing the Report of the Committee on Resolutions, J.C. Cheung (CA A), Chair, read Section III of the following:

Resolutions of the Convention

Section I. {Short skit satirizing the Convention}

Section II. On behalf of the Resolutions Committee for the 2002 National Tau Beta Pi Convention, we start by thanking the host chapter, Michigan Epsilon. It’s only by the hard work of people like Chapter President Boban Jancevski, Arrangements Chair Abha Tiwari, and other members of Michigan Epsilon that we are able to run barefoot through the halls of such a finely organized Convention.

At this time we present an appreciation plaque to Boban for his hard work and dedication to the success of this year’s Convention. (present plaque here)

We also acknowledge the work of Abha, who taught us how to finally get to the food court, with a special Bent desk piece. (present Bent here)

The next thank you is bittersweet. The five members of the outgoing Executive Council have donated their blood, sweat, and tears to this Association for the past four years without reserve. It is through their extensive time and effort that this Association is as great as it is now. So with that, we would like to thank Dr. Douglas M. Green, P.E., President; Edward J. D’Avignon, Vice President; and Councillors Dr. Jerome A. Atkins, Dr. George D. Peterson, P.E.; and Catherine P. Rice, P.E., for everything they have done for us.

Subsequently, we would like to welcome the incoming President, Dr. Matthew W. Ohland as well as Vice President Ellen D. Styles, and the Councillors Alison L. Hu, Russell W. Pierce, and Dennis J. Tyner.

We also express our gratitude toward Ron Hickling for being patient with us even though we have no idea when we’re allowed to speak.

Of course we cannot forget to thank the many generous corporate sponsors of this Convention. Above all, we thank Ford Motor Company—oh sorry!—GM for hosting us in its newly renovated center and for providing us with such fine meals. In addition, we thank Lockheed “Nartin” for the $24 salad.

Also, we are grateful to the Marriott Hotel staff, particularly for granting clearance for our picture to be taken inside the building.

We also recognize some of the other hard-working Tau Bates such as the Director of Fellowships and/or Scholarships D. Stephen Pierre Jr., P.E, and the other members of the Fellowship and/or Scholarship Board(s), Henry J. Chaya, Dr. Susan L. Holl, and Dr. Velio A. Marsocci, P.E.

We also thank the Director of Rituals Alan R. Hirsch for making sure that none of us catch on fire with our initiation equipment this year.

We give a special thanks to exiting Director of Engineering Futures Russell W. Pierce. The 44 volunteer instructors in the Engineering Futures Program are too numerous to list, but they presented nearly 250 sessions last year. We give our sincerest thanks to Russ Pierce and the volunteers; for without them, we would not have learned how to appreciate 1980s cinema and to be indirect, non-specific, and punishing. We also welcome incoming Director of Engineering Futures Annette Brenner.

We extend further thanks to Tau Beta Pi Assistant Secretary-Treasurer Roger E. Hawks for all of the time he has given for our benefit.

We must also thank the members of Tau Beta Pi’s Trust Advisory Committee, Rodger F. Smith, chair, James A. Runde, and James W. Johnson Jr., who are in charge of managing the funds of the Association, for not gambling all of our money away in Canada.

Next we congratulate the three Laureates of this year, Devon J. Battaglia, PA A ’03, Sarah T. Bauer, IA A ’03, and Erik C. Porse, CT G ’02.

We also recognize the 38 Tau Beta Pi Scholars who were chosen this past year.

Additional congratulations to 2002 Tau Beta Pi National Outstanding Advisor Dr. Larry A. Simonson from South Dakota Alpha.

Congratulations also to Tau Beta Pi 2002 Distinguished Alumnus Dr. Lyle D. Fiesel, IA A ’61.

Congratulations and welcome to Virginia Commonwealth University’s Tau Beta Phi on its grant of a Charter. We are all certain that they will be a wonderful addition to our family.

We also hope the four chapters installed in the past year are finding their way around the Convention, because the rest of us are lost. Those chapters are Missouri Delta at UMKC, installed on January 26, Oregon Gamma at the University of Portland, installed on February 9, New Hampshire Beta at Dartmouth College, installed on February 23, and Texas Mu at the University of Texas at San Antonio on March 2.

An extra special thank you to the 15,000 alumni who made donations throughout the year. Your support for the Association and, in particular the Fellowship Program in this financially difficult year, has been much appreciated. The 168 companies who have generously supported our Fellowship Program through matching grant gifts to our Alumni Giving Program have also been instrumental in the success of this program.

Section III. As the Convention draws to a close, it is important to remember everything we have learned here: the great project ideas, the friendships, Robert’s Newly Revised Rules of Order, the inter-chapter connections, and most importantly the enthusiasm for securing the ideals of Tau Beta Pi. Go back to your home chapters infused with the energy of this group and with the inspiration to become the best Tau Beta Pi chapter your school has ever had (an easier task for some than others).

We appreciate the dedication everyone here has shown in attending this Convention. Our hosts at Michigan Epsilon have done an excellent job this weekend, and we are extremely grateful. On behalf of the Resolutions Committee, I thank all of you and wish you the best.

President Green introduced and formally installed each member of the Four Corners Council, and turned over the Tau Beta Pi gavel to 2002-06 President Matthew W. Ohland. Dr. Ohland thanked the retiring Council for its four years of excellent service and dedication to Tau Beta Pi, and Councillor Russell W. Pierce presented a copper fountain with engraving on the front (Thanks to the 1998-2002 Executive Council for leading the Association into new waters) and the Tau Beta Pi logo etched on the glass to each retiring Councillor in sequence. Councillor George D. Peterson was recognized for his work with internationalization, Councillor Atkins for his work in establishing the Pre-Convention Issues Forum and in bringing enthusiasm and energy to the Society, Councillor Rice for her leadership in improving the image materials so that engineering students will become more aware of and excited about the Society, Vice President D'Avignon for his knowledge of the Constitution and Bylaws and assistance with Headquarters information technology improvements that enhance the Association's communications and operations, and President Green for his leadership and his work on building the endowment. The Convention responded enthusiastically with a standing ovation and applause.

In the spirit of the occasion, the entire banquet group joined Executive Director Froula in the Tau Beta Pi yell. On the motion of numerous delegates, seconded by B. Jancevski (MI E), after a voice vote, Chairman Hickling declared the Convention adjourned sine die at 9:40 p.m.

Submitted by,

James D. Froula, P.E.
Convention Secretary